Re: Howard !

From: Alex Filonov <afilonov_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 2 Jun 2003 08:17:49 -0700
Message-ID: <336da121.0306020717.631776c2@posting.google.com>

Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_exxesolutions.com> wrote in message news:<3ED7E46B.6B9F3AD9_at_exxesolutions.com>...
> Noons wrote:
>
> > I'd rather have the legend in his own mind
> > than the one in yours. But that's just
> > my personal opinion...
> >
> > --
> > Cheers
> > Nuno Souto
> > wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
> > "Jitendra Patel" <coldrainandsnow_at_lycos.com> wrote in message
> > news:7610580f.0305301015.1db60dc5_at_posting.google.com...
> >
> > > Howard is a legend in his own mind. . . . .
>
> One to which I ascribe. Howard may not be perfect. But he's been a far
> sight closer to that mark than any of his vocal detractors.
>

I second this opinion. Sometimes I disagreed with Howard, but I don't see any reason to question his competence. Not to mention the fact that his arrogance level is a little bit lower than of some other frequent posters here (me included, I'm afraid).

> If they don't like his tone of voice they can either ignore his posts or
> address the matter off-line. Personally I'm more often offended by those
> whining about verbiage than by the verbiage that started the whole thing
> in the first place.
>
> Come on back Howard and I'll admit to other pranks played on me by my
> students.
Received on Mon Jun 02 2003 - 10:17:49 CDT