Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Worst of the worst

Re: Worst of the worst

From: Mladen Gogala <mgogala_at_adelphia.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 02:12:37 GMT
Message-Id: <pan.2003.05.27.02.12.35.277822@adelphia.net>


On Mon, 26 May 2003 17:03:11 -0700, Daniel Morgan wrote:

> Had they not gotten it correctly twice in the same block I'd be more forgiving. But this? Obviously no one
> ever tried this example before including it in the docs.
> --

Or may be the person who create this sample has done something like this:

create or replace procedure get_time(t out number) as
begin
t:=dbms_utility.get_time;
end;
/

In his/her own schema. That would, for instance, make the procedure right. If the person who has created the example is an experienced PL/SQL programmer, it is very likely that she or he has certain helper procedures in her or his own schema. Anyway, the procedure illustrates FORALL and FOREACH clauses very well. I don't find that to be a big deal. On the other hand, on the oracle mailing list the debate about Oracle Untested Infuriator (OUI) is just subsiding.

-- 
Mladen Gogala
Software is like sex, it is better when it is free.
Linus Torvalds 
Received on Mon May 26 2003 - 21:12:37 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US