Re: Why would an Insert /+ append / be slower than a straight insert?

From: Paul Brewer <paul_at_paul.brewers.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 23:05:03 +0100
Message-ID: <3ecd49b4_3@mk-nntp-1.news.uk.worldonline.com>

"Ryan" <rgaffuri_at_cox.net> wrote in message news:UOaza.52438$823.38070_at_news1.east.cox.net...
>

<snip a gazillion questions>

Why don't you buy a book or two, or check the documentation, or Tahiti, instead of posting every single question to this NG? I'm not trying to discourage you; it would be a quicker learning process anyway.

Regards,
Paul Received on Thu May 22 2003 - 17:05:03 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Antoine BRUNEL: "Re: Why would an Insert /*+ append */ be slower than a straight insert?"
Previous message: Paul Brewer: "Re: Assignment of undo tablespace to new user"
In reply to: Ryan: "Re: Why would an Insert /*+ append */ be slower than a straight insert?"
Next in thread: Ryan Gaffuri: "Re: Why would an Insert /*+ append */ be slower than a straight insert?"
Reply: Ryan Gaffuri: "Re: Why would an Insert /*+ append */ be slower than a straight insert?"
Reply: Ryan Gaffuri: "Re: Why would an Insert /*+ append */ be slower than a straight insert?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US