Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: statspack report - SQL*Net data stuff

Re: statspack report - SQL*Net data stuff

From: Karsten Farrell <kfarrell_at_belgariad.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 15:32:45 GMT
Message-ID: <MPG.19353bf254f583c2989789@news.la.sbcglobal.net>


hub_at_houston.rr.NOSPAM.com said...
>
> We're having some weird network problems and I think I'm seeing some of it
> in the statspack report. Here is an excerpt:
>
>
> Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms)
> /txn
> ---------------------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ------ -----
> ---
> db file sequential read 7,959,227 0 4,678 1
> 10.3
> db file scattered read 5,581,367 0 2,948 1
> 7.3
> log file sync 824,640 160 2,195 3
> 1.1
> SQL*Net more data to client 17,819,017 0 1,317 0
> 23.2
> <snip>
> SQL*Net message from client 133,289,942 0 ########## 190
> 173.3
>
> Are those SQL*Net values excessive?
>
> Another symptom is that I will be scp'ing some files from one server to
> another, then things slow down bigtime for awhile, then they resume normal
> transfer speed. Any ideas on how I can track down this temporary
> congestion, and might it be related to the SQL*Net waits?
>
>
> Any info much appreciated.. thx!
>

Usually the SQL*Net values can be ignored. This from the book "Oracle Performance Tuning 101":

"SQL*Net message from/to client"
"Indicates elapsed time during communication between the user process and the server process. In some rare cases can shed light on a network transmission problem, but for the most part can be ignored. If the application supports the configuration of ARRAYSIZE (for example, Oracle Forms, SQL*Plus, Pro*C, and so on), configuring ARRAYSIZE to a value greater than its default value can potentially decrease the waits for this event."

By saying "elapsed time," it tells me it's not really "wait" time ... except in the sense that the user can't do anything while sqlnet is talking.

-- 
/Karsten
DBA > retired > DBA
Received on Wed May 21 2003 - 10:32:45 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US