Re: Oracle 9.2 on RH9 Java initialisation error

From: Dave Hau <davehau-no-spam-123_at_no-spam.netscape.net>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 16:07:40 GMT
Message-ID: <gj7ya.2957$U43.1475@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com>

"Mladen Gogala" <mgogala_at_adelphia.net> wrote in message news:pan.2003.05.19.10.48.19.420335_at_adelphia.net...
> On Mon, 19 May 2003 09:32:07 +0000, Dave Hau wrote:
>
> >
> > As mentioned in the bug report, the issue has been fixed in
> > glibc-2.3.2-4.80.6 by re-adding the symbol __ctype_b to libc.a. (The
> > original version of glibc in RH9 is 2.3.2-27.9)
>
> So, does that make oracle work OK on RH 9? Installation goes well and

I can't say it's risk free. But IMHO it should be no more riskier than running it on RH 8.

Cheers,
Dave

> everything works as advertised? You obviously have some internal knowledge
> which I lack. Approximately a month ago I posted an article on this group
> about RH9 and Oracle. I solved my problems by reloading RH 8.0. Is it
> safe to load RH 9? I know it isn't supported but that has't ever stopped
> me before. RH 8.0 isn't supported either.
> --
> Mladen Gogala
> Software is like sex, it is better when it is free.
> Linus Torvalds
>
Received on Mon May 19 2003 - 11:07:40 CDT