Re: Australian trip.

"Nuno Souto" <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam> wrote in message news:<3ec0e94f$1$16259$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au>...
> "Vox" <Vox_at_vox1.com> wrote in message news:b9qmij$8q4$1_at_perki.connect.com.au...
>
> > Hang on. We have an issue here.
>
> No. You, an unidentified person who has seldom if ever
> contributed to this group, may have an "issue".
> I and a lot of others don't. How's that for size?
>

This is somewhat aggressive don't you think? And how many people have you actually canvassed to find out whether they have an issue? Personally, I don't have any issue, but I am not so arrogant as to assume that my opinion is the only valid one.

>
> > Please, Jonathan, do you held your seminars for free or some admission needs
> > to be payed?
>
> Do you sell your wares under another identification
> or are they for free?
>

How irrelevant

>
> > advertisement channel. In that case you are breaching group and ethic
> > etiquette.
>
> And you appear to have a good grasp on what that
> "etiquette and ethic" is? Please enlighten us all?
>

Are you seriously that ignorant? Of course not, just being sarcastic, but not in the least bit amusing.

> While you are at it, please identify yourself.
> Right now. With your name and some proof of identity.
> We all do identify ourselves here. Why don't you?
> Afraid of something we shouldn't know about?
>

Why should they? - why do YOU decide that anonymity is so abhorrant. I can imagine that a damned good reason for anonymity is to avoid attacks such as yours.

>
> > If seminars are free of charge then I'm just wondering how you can travel
> > around the world without financial input.
>
> No, you are not "wondering". You are insinuating with a
> very well defined intention.
>

You really do have no sense of humour either. And what exactly was the insinuation?

>
> > I appreciate your long term contribution and other people as well.
>
> Funny, I don't remember your contributions here or even a statement
> of being a listener. How come you "appreciate" contributions all
> of a sudden?
>

Oh please. Either 1) they are a lurker or 2) They've posted under another ID.

>
> > that this group is public unprofitable space with the majority of silent
> > very well qualified DBAs and minority of loud frequent posters.
>
> Hmmmm. If the "loud frequent posters" shut up what happens to
> the "silent very qualified" ones? Do they start talking or
> just keep, well, silent? Would make for a very interesting
> group...
>

How to miss the point by a mile

>
> > frequency does not allow anyone to reshape this newsgroup in any other
> > directions or to use blunt language in any context.
>
> And non-frequency does not give you or anybody else the
> right to come here and heap on frequent contributors
> who are the life of this group. And have made it
> what it is. OBTW, where was the blunt language from
> Jonathan? Or was that also an insinuation?
>

"Heap on"? Don't you think you're being a bit oversensitive here? Mr/Ms Vox just seemed to think (wrongly IMO) that Jonathan's posting was motivated by financial reasons. Can't ever recall reading "blunt language" from Jonathan though.

> You on the contrary are just noise. Not happy?
> Then go away to whatever hole you came from, troll.
What a truly unpleasant person you are. Or were you just having a bad day?

CE Received on Thu May 15 2003 - 11:02:36 CDT