Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: IBM Debunks Oracle's MultiVersion Read Consistency ?

Re: IBM Debunks Oracle's MultiVersion Read Consistency ?

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 05:43:23 GMT
Message-ID: <%dHua.525417$OV.498183@rwcrnsc54>


Excellent reference, Connor.
Jim

-- 
Replace part of the email address: kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com
with family.  Remove the negative part, keep the minus sign.  You can figure
it out.
"Connor McDonald" <connor_mcdonald_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3EBB11DA.2CEC_at_yahoo.com...

> Jeremy Rickard wrote:
> >
> > Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam> wrote in message
news:<Xns9375E27CD466ATokenthis_at_210.49.20.254>...
> > > Following up on Jeremy Rickard, 08 May 2003:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > As I said, the code base is shared on Windows, Linux and UNIX
flavours
> > >
> > > Proof? Or you implicitly believe anything IBM says?
> >
> > I work in depth with the product on all those 3 platforms, so I *know*
> > it is the same. In terms of SQL, commands, utilities, architecture
> > and detailed documentation it is the same. Release dates for those
> > platforms are always the same. Etc., etc.
> >
> > > > Gartner split out the figures to avoid that skew.
> > >
> > > Oh no they damn well did NOT. IBM does NOT provide that
> > > information to ANYONE.
> >
> > I believe their methodology is market research based. They have been
> > publishing for years, and are well respected. Check out
> > http://www.gartner.com/reprints/microsoft/106576.html
> >
> > [rest of rant snipped]
> >
> > Ciao.
> >
> > JR
>
> An interesting disection on the paper at:
>
> http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:146624503414632213
>
> (you need to scroll down about half-way before it starts)
> >
> --
> =========================
> Connor McDonald
> http://www.oracledba.co.uk
>
> "Some days you're the pigeon, some days you're the statue"
Received on Fri May 09 2003 - 00:43:23 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US