Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: VARRAYS for VLDB
The only general point I would make is that varrays need to be unpacked to be used - so there is no high-precision access to them.
This may be memory and CPU intensive,
and is perhaps an area where the code
may not have been stressed by other
users very often - i.e. higher-risk because
it is closer to the leading edge.
-- Regards Jonathan Lewis http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk The educated person is not the person who can answer the questions, but the person who can question the answers -- T. Schick Jr One-day tutorials: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html ____Denmark__May 21-23rd ____Sweden___June ____Finland__September ____Norway___September Three-day seminar: see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html ____UK_(Manchester)_May x 2 ____Estonia___June 4th - 6th ____Australia_June 18th - 20th (Perth) ____Australia_June 23rd - 25th (t.b.a) ____USA_(CA, TX)_August The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html "Karsten Schmidt" <groups_at_karsten-schmidt.com> wrote in message news:c6711ac4.0304280001.298803f6_at_posting.google.com...Received on Tue May 06 2003 - 08:21:38 CDT
> Thanks Jonathan ,
> I am most likely going with Oracle 9.2.0.3.0 on HPUX 11.11, 64 bit.
>
> a) sounds a little scary. I suppose, I really have to benchmark the
> two options.
>
> b) should not be an issue for me, as you already figured, the
inserts
> are always going to the right-hand side of the primay key index.
> Apart from that, there is still the option to re-build the
partition
> once no new data is coming in. (create ... as select, exchange
> partition...)
> I am doing that successfully with other databases with partitioned
> IOT's.
>
> Is there anything in particular that I should watch for when
testing
> the VARRAY option ? - i.e. is it bogus exexution plans for queries,
> excessive cpu usage, memory issues etc. ?
> Most likely, the entire thing will be i/o bound, so at this point,
I
> am not too concerned to spend a few cpu cycles on object un-nesting.
>
> best regards
> Karsten