Re: compatible - 5th sig digit?

Paul Drake wrote:

> Hi.
>
> Does anyone have any thoughts in regard to setting the 5th digit in
> the parameter "compatible"?
>
> this is a multiple choice question.
>
> 1. 8.1.7.4 as the 5th digit is not significant.
> 2. 8.1.7.4.1 as the 5th digit is not significant, but fill it in
> anyways.
> 3. 8.1.7.4.10 as the 5th digit is significant in win32 land.
> 4. 8.1.7.4.9 as the 5th digit is significant, but .10 would screw it
> up
> 5. 8.1.7 as the 4th digit is not significant either.
> 6. rtfm
>
> thanks,
>
> Paul

Irrelevant. These are bug fixes/patches. Not new functionality.

--
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/extinfo/certprog/oad/oad_crs.asp
(remove one 'x' from my email address to reply)