compatible - 5th sig digit?

Hi.

Does anyone have any thoughts in regard to setting the 5th digit in the parameter "compatible"?

this is a multiple choice question.

1. 8.1.7.4 as the 5th digit is not significant.
2. 8.1.7.4.1 as the 5th digit is not significant, but fill it in anyways.
3. 8.1.7.4.10 as the 5th digit is significant in win32 land.
4. 8.1.7.4.9 as the 5th digit is significant, but .10 would screw it up
5. 8.1.7 as the 4th digit is not significant either.
6. rtfm

thanks,

Paul Received on Sat Apr 26 2003 - 18:05:20 CDT