Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Schema Placement for Purchased Apps

Re: Schema Placement for Purchased Apps

From: Howard J. Rogers <howardjr20002_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 20:42:41 +1000
Message-ID: <z0bma.13354$1s1.219393@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>


9i New Features Release 2 Course Documents say on one of the first pages of the material introducing this feature that it was introduced for the purposes of Transportable Tablespaces.

So yes, it is documented

Regards
HJR "Pete Sharman" <peter.sharman_at_oracle.com> wrote in message news:b752n30162u_at_drn.newsguy.com...
> In article <m_ydnVXbwKZ4MAijXTWcqA_at_giganews.com>, "Gabriel says...
> >
> >> Different block sizes are there for one reason only - to transport
> >tablespaces
> >> from different block sized databases into a staging database before
> >> summarization and so on into the data warehouse.
> >
> >Hmmm... Is this documented anywhere? I mean, it makes sense now that
you
> >mention it, but I've not noticed the feature treated as a "by the way..."
> >issue in the docs. I mean, if this is what they are there for, the docs
> >should mention it somewhere, so maybe I just haven't seen it. It's not
like
> >I sit around and read the docs all day either!
> >
> >
> It was certainly in the 9i NF course way back when I first saw it, but
like you
> I wouldn't have a clue if it's in the doc. I know the Dev guys definitely
> wanted it presented as I said, but I very rarely actually look at the doc
except
> the Reference Guide nowadays.
>
> HTH. Additions and corrections welcome.
>
> Pete
>
> SELECT standard_disclaimer, witty_remark FROM company_requirements;
>
Received on Sun Apr 13 2003 - 05:42:41 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US