Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: DBMS_STATS Syntax

Re: DBMS_STATS Syntax

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 20:20:16 +0100
Message-ID: <b71roi$5jc$1$830fa7b3@news.demon.co.uk>

Shouldn't that be

    FOR INDEXES
not

    FOR ALL INDEXES (I haven't checked the manual, though,
so I may be wrong.)

--
Regards

Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

  The educated person is not the person
  who can answer the questions, but the
  person who can question the answers -- T. Schick Jr


One-day tutorials:
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html

____UK_______April 22nd
____Denmark__May 21-23rd
____USA_(FL)_May 2nd

Three-day seminar:
see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
____UK_(Manchester)_May
____Estonia___June (provisional)
____Australia_June (provisional)
____USA_(CA, TX)_August

The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html


"Buck Turgidson" <jc_va_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6ee34f9c3f89216988faf5bdc39fc713_at_news.teranews.com...

> Trying to gather stats for my schema, and am getting an error in
8.1.7. Can
> someone spot my error?
>
> 13:39:35 SQL>
> 13:39:36 SQL> BEGIN
> 13:39:50 2 dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats(
> 13:39:50 3 user
> 13:39:50 4 ,estimate_percent => 30
> 13:39:50 5 ,block_sample => FALSE
> 13:39:50 6 ,method_opt => 'FOR TABLE FOR ALL INDEXES
FOR ALL
> INDEXED COLUMNS SIZE 30'
> 13:39:50 7 ,degree => NULL
> 13:39:50 8 ,granularity => 'DEFAULT'
> 13:39:50 9 ,cascade => FALSE
> 13:39:50 10 );
> 13:39:50 11 END;
> 13:39:50 12 /
> BEGIN
> *
> ERROR at line 1:
> ORA-01490: invalid ANALYZE command
> ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_DDL", line 179
> ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STATS", line 4467
> ORA-06510: PL/SQL: unhandled user-defined exception
> ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STATS", line 4610
> ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STATS", line 4720
> ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STATS", line 4702
> ORA-06512: at line 2
>
>
>
Received on Wed Apr 09 2003 - 14:20:16 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US