You will note that I didn't object to the original post since there was only
one of it and it was well worded. What I don't buy is "I don't charge
therefore my ads come under different rules - and hey look there is a
technical definition of spam which I don't meet so na na na na " or similar
justifications.
can I come off the group grumpy pills yet ?
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
*****************************************
Please include version and platform
and SQL where applicable
It makes life easier and increases the
likelihood of a good answer
******************************************
"Hans Forbrich" <forbrich_at_telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:3E92F0F1.397BDA84_at_telusplanet.net...
> Niall Litchfield wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm afraid that I do not mind what licencing people use when promoting
their
> > products, promotion of products should really go IMO in .marketplace
where
> > it is appropriate and not .misc and .server where it isn't. It also
seems
> > somewhat clear to me that Dan was using spam in its widely accepted
sense
> > not in the technical sense of what sort of post can be cancelled from
NNTP
> > groups.
>
> IMHO, since this is an announcement, and clearly indicated as such, I
would
> prefer seeing it in marketplace. (This way we can reserve .server for
flame
> fests. <g>)
>
> I do object that this is cross-posted. And I apologize for corss-posting
the
> reply.
>
> I do wonder whether a different approach, for .server and .tools, would
have
> worked without raising blood pressure. Something like "Would anyone care
to
> evaluate or comment on a new tool that we believe could be a replacement
for
> ...."
>
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 08 2003 - 15:55:49 CDT
