Re: Oracle 9.2.0.1 Patch to 9.2.0.2

Thanks for your response DA. When I read the installation, the post installation instructions seemed odd to me, which I why I posted my question. The way I understood the instructions it seemed like I only need to upgrade databases/server instances that existed prior to the installation of the patchset.

I watched the memory guidelines for the JVM and Large Pool, and everything went off without a hitch.

I find it odd that server instances created after an upgrade still have to go through the migration process. Coming from the informix word, once a patchset was appied, newly created server instances did not need to be migrated.

P.S. I'm running this server on Linux, and we are specifically going to it because it solves an INSO file format issue format for us.

Thanks Again,

Khalid.

"DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_exxesolutions.com> wrote in message news:3E7A68FE.EFA9F8AA_at_exxesolutions.com...
> Khalid Eidoo wrote:
>
> > I'm about to install Oracle 9.2.0.1 and the 9.2.0.2 patchset on a test
linux
> > server. My plan is to install 9.2.0.1, software only (and only standard
> > edition). Afterwards, I will go ahead with the upgrade to 9.2.0.2.
Assuming
> > create databases (and listeners) after 9.2.0.2 has been installed, I
assume
> > I wont't need to perform any of the 'startup migrate' scripts
afterwards.
> > Can anyone confirm/refute this assumption?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Khalid.
>
> Why don't you just read the installation instructions?
>
> Of course you have to.
>
> But be careful about the number of zeros when you modify your init
parameters. I
> thought I did everything correctly and messed up that way much to my
> embarrasement.
>
> Daniel Morgan
>
Received on Fri Mar 21 2003 - 21:12:27 CST