Re: Hi-- Upgrading from SQL Server 6.5 to oracle

Joel Garry wrote:

> DA Morgan <damorgan_at_exxesolutions.com> wrote in message news:<3E77D9FF.9486EB9D_at_exxesolutions.com>...
> > NorwoodThree wrote:
> >
> > > This is the only thing I can provide with the limited information you
> > > have given me:
> > >
> > > 1. Contact Oracle for pricing. Ballpark figure is 40k per proc
> > > 2. The latest version 9.2.0.1.0 is probably what I would recommend (
> > > with the security patches).
> >
> > FYI: Latest for Windows is 9.2.0.2.0. Latest for most UNIX platforms is
> > not 9.2.0.3.0
>
> I know of at least one enterprise product that runs on 9.2.0.1 and not
> on 9.2.0.2. It is important to ask the vendor explicitly if you are
> using any particular products. There's definitely a debate to be made
> over latest and greatest for production systems, as we all should
> know. Not the place for unpleasant surprises.
>
> jg
> --
> @home is bogus.
> I'm sure it will always be fixed in the next release.

I think it is impossible for something to run on 9.2.0.1 and not 9.2.0.2. Simply impossible. What is the origin of this statement?

Daniel Morgan Received on Thu Mar 20 2003 - 00:06:54 CST