Re: Oracle versus MS Sqlserver 2000: Technical Comparison of the Features in the two databases

Following up on Howard J. Rogers, 10 Mar 2003:

>
> As it happens, if you are a Windows shop, I think you would seriously
> want to question any proposal to install anything other than SQL Server.
> The Windows architecture plays merry havoc with Oracle performance, but
> suits SQl Server rather nicely.

Aye!

>
> I've snipped the rest. It's boring. Oracle is a fabulous product. And I
> like SQL Server too. But this sort of bogus comparison doesn't deserve
> the bandwith.

And wrong too. Oracle was NOT the first commercial SQL RDBMS. SQL/DS and DB2 were. A little known fact.

>
> You should get slated for bringing "religion" into what should be a
> cool, calculated evaluation.
>

If only that was heard in a much wider audience.... :(

-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam