Re: performance problems after increasing redolog size

> No - they are not multiplexed, just 4 members (Redo01.log - Redo04.log)

That means you have 4 groups not 4 members.

> I think it does not make sense on a raid level 5 (thats the only raid level
> available
> on that server) - am i right ?
>

whatever be the raid level, you *must* multiplex redolog group members on different disks to minimize the chances of redolog corruption.

search this NG archives on google to get more information on multiplexing redolog members.

-Stan Received on Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:43:10 CST