Re: mod_plsql alternatives

Which is back to what I was trying to get to the bottom of originally...

Take standard apache and use either dbprism or the free mod_plsql and only use Oracle for the database.

Still like to know if anyone has done this , either in development or deployed as a production, internet-facing service?

-- 

jeremy


In article <E2F6A70FE45242488C865C3BC1245DA703638158
@lnewton.leeds.lfs.co.uk>, Norman.Dunbar_at_lfs.co.uk says...


> Hi Tanel,

> 

> Ok, you got me with that one. I thought that mod_plsql was from Apache,

> not from Oracle. I now stand corrected.

> 

> In which case, the OP needs to use DBPrism which is a mod_plsql

> replacement, and free, from www.Apache.org - it says that it replaces

> mod_plsql and gives the same facilities. Not that I've tried it myself

> though.

> 

> Regards,

> Norman.

> 

> -------------------------------------

> Norman Dunbar

> Database/Unix administrator

> Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.

> mailto:Norman.Dunbar_at_LFS.co.uk

> Tel: 0113 289 6265

> Fax: 0113 289 3146

> URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com

> -------------------------------------

> 

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Tanel Poder [mailto:tanel@@peldik.com]

> Posted At: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:43 AM

> Posted To: server

> Conversation: mod_plsql alternatives

> Subject: Re: mod_plsql alternatives

> 

> 

> > I don't know, however, if it is not, you can still download and

> install

> > a 'normal' Apache server from the Apache poeple and add mod_plsql to

> it

> > - so no licencing problems, just a lot more work - or so it seems,

> > getting mod_plsql working.

> 

> Hello!

> 

> And where do you get this mod_plsql from? ... Oracle distribution.

> Though I've not read the licencing agreements lately, it seems to me,

> that

> if you put your mod_plsql taken from Oracle Server to a separate

> machine,

> you need another license...

> 

> Tanel.

> 

> 

>