Re: (long) Sniffing redo logs to maintain cache consistency?

Following up on Joel Garry, 01 Mar 2003:

>
> Acceptable performance has been < 2 seconds since the 70's.
>

Let's be fair: no one needs better than <2secs. What we do now is process a LOT more in that timeframe and we're able to do it with an order of magnitude more clients.

Unless we're using a Java cache, that is! <g, d&r!>

-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
nsouto_at_optusnet.com.au.nospam