Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: max # of columns in the table (again!)

Re: max # of columns in the table (again!)

From: Tanel Poder <tanel_at_remove.this.peldik.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 19:28:24 +0100
Message-ID: <3e4e7929_2@news.estpak.ee>


Hi,

But this case of chaining doesn't usually cause a performance problem, because the row is chained to the same block, thus no additional IO is needed.

Tanel.

"dias" <ydias_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:55a68b47.0302150246.3fbd5c04_at_posting.google.com...
> Hi,
>
> I have the answer ... whith a small test
> It's still the case in 9i.
> The stats "table fetch continued row" are incremented when a select is
> made on a table with more than 255 columns.
>
> Dias
>
>
> ydias_at_hotmail.com (dias) wrote in message
news:<55a68b47.0302142315.39934901_at_posting.google.com>...
> > Hi,
> >
> > 1000 columns is the max for a table (8i and 9i).
> >
> > Oracle (8i) has an internal limit of 255. That means that if any
> > columns beyond 255 are not null, that row will always be chained.
> >
> > Is this still the case in 9i ?
> >
> > Thanks
Received on Sat Feb 15 2003 - 12:28:24 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US