Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: max # of columns in the table (again!)

Re: max # of columns in the table (again!)

From: Sybrand Bakker <gooiditweg_at_nospam.demon.nl>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 10:09:47 +0100
Message-ID: <qq0s4v8m29tp3rhmmll5q3tet93codfqhl@4ax.com>


On 14 Feb 2003 23:15:58 -0800, ydias_at_hotmail.com (dias) wrote:

>Oracle (8i) has an internal limit of 255. That means that if any
>columns beyond 255 are not null, that row will always be chained.

Sounds like nonsense to me. Whether a row is chained is determined *ONLY* by the number of bytes available in a block, NOT by the number of columns and NOT by a FIXED limit.
In fact, it is quite possible, especially when you choose a small block size, to have rows with long varchar2s chained.

Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA

To reply remove -verwijderdit from my e-mail address Received on Sat Feb 15 2003 - 03:09:47 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US