Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Determine number of blocks above HWM and below HWM

Re: Determine number of blocks above HWM and below HWM

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_exesolutions.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 01:17:28 -0800
Message-ID: <3E4CB428.82890AC1@exesolutions.com>


Pete Sharman wrote:

> In article <3E4C80FA.262E0E6F_at_exesolutions.com>, DA says...
> >
> >Bill & Mary Border wrote:
> >
> >> I think I know what you are asking. Download
> >> "orastat" from http://dbamon.com/orastat and
> >> run "orastat -dh".
> >>
> >> "Akin S. Walter-Johnson III" <asjohns_at_uchicago.edu> wrote in message
> >> news:eIR2a.60$K4.25165_at_news.uchicago.edu...
> >> > Anyone knows how to determine number of blocks above and below the High
> >> > water mark, and if so
> >> > how can I reset the HWM.
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >I'm not interested in whether some tool written by some person is reporting
> >some value next to some label. I am asking how can there be a block above the
> >HWM? It goes against my entire understanding of the concept behind HWM.
> >
> >Howard, Tom, Jonathan, Richard ... any help here? Thanks.
> >
> >Daniel Morgan
> >
> Well, if the OP was running 9i, it could be above the LOW high water mark, and
> not above the HIGH high water mark.
>
> BTW, I'm not kidding. There are now two high water marks. Blocks above the low
> high water mark may or may not be formatted by Oracle, and blocks above the high
> high water mark definitely aren't, IIRC the definition correctly. However, I
> suspect the OP doesn't mean this and is simply confused about the meaning of the
> high water mark.
>
> HTH. Additions and corrections welcome.
>
> Pete
>
> SELECT standard_disclaimer, witty_remark FROM company_requirements;

Thanks. It is 1:16am and now that I have confirmation I can go to bed and sleep soundly ... knowing that someone in the UK is undoubtedly about to drag their sorry .... out of bed and start it all over again.

Daniel Morgan Received on Fri Feb 14 2003 - 03:17:28 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US