Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 9i under NT and Linux

Re: 9i under NT and Linux

From: Tim X <timx_at_spamto.devnul.com>
Date: 01 Feb 2003 15:17:27 +1100
Message-ID: <87n0lgr5wo.fsf@tiger.rapttech.com.au>


>>>>> "Frank" == Frank <fvanbortel_at_netscape.net> writes:

 Frank> Jim Kennedy wrote:
>> I saw an excellent article on otn.oracle.com about this. It
>> talked about different file systems on Linux and what worked best
>> for Oracle. Give it a read, I think it is still on the main page.
>> Jim --

>> Replace part of the email address:
>> kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com with family. Remove the
>> negative part, keep the minus sign. You can figure it out.
>> "Jean" <x_at_y.z> wrote in message
>> news:b1e5b1$t4n$1_at_news-reader12.wanadoo.fr...
>>

>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have installed 9i under Windows and Linux.
>>>
>>> I feel that it works slower under Linux. I have noticed a lot of
>>> disk I/O.
>>>
>>> Is there something to do to enhance IO opération or is it a
>>> Linux specificity ?
>>>
>>> Jean
>>>
>>> PS : I don't want a debate Win vs Linux ...
>>>
>>>
>>

 Frank> Yup - bottom line: ext2 is best - raw fs only marinally  Frank> faster. Much to the surprise of the tester.

What about ext3 which is a journalled filesystem?

Tim

-- 
Tim Cross
The e-mail address on this message is FALSE (obviously!). My real e-mail is
to a company in Australia called rapttech and my login is tcross - if you 
really need to send mail, you should be able to work it out!
Received on Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:17:27 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US