Re: 9i under NT and Linux

From: Frank <fvanbortel_at_netscape.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 23:51:55 +0100
Message-ID: <3E3AFE0B.2070703@netscape.net>

Jim Kennedy wrote:
> I saw an excellent article on otn.oracle.com about this. It talked about
> different file systems on Linux and what worked best for Oracle. Give it a
> read, I think it is still on the main page.
> Jim
>
> --
> Replace part of the email address: kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com
> with family. Remove the negative part, keep the minus sign. You can figure
> it out.
> "Jean" <x_at_y.z> wrote in message
> news:b1e5b1$t4n$1_at_news-reader12.wanadoo.fr...
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I have installed 9i under Windows and Linux.
>>
>>I feel that it works slower under Linux. I have noticed a lot of disk I/O.
>>
>>Is there something to do to enhance IO opération or is it a Linux
>>specificity ?
>>
>>Jean
>>
>>PS : I don't want a debate Win vs Linux ...
>>
>>
>

Yup - bottom line: ext2 is best - raw fs only marinally faster. Much to the surprise of the tester.

Frank Received on Fri Jan 31 2003 - 16:51:55 CST