Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: REDO Logs - 3rd mirror?

Re: REDO Logs - 3rd mirror?

From: vob <ga_at_aol.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 01:06:57 +0100
Message-ID: <b0skcn$gp3$00$1@news.t-online.com>


should use standby database

in 9i replicated by online log

"JustAnotherDBA" <jadba_at_bellsouth.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:sBpX9.58033$Jm2.54069_at_news.bellsouth.net...
> UPS maintenance caused power to flicker off and on several times to our
main
> Oracle production server causing the loss of 5 disk drives in 1 RAID
array -
> 4 of which were used to hold just the REDO logs for 2 of 3 databases.
These
> 2 Oracle databases were setup to multiplex on 2 RAID1 (mirrored) disks.
This
> is a large Unix server, SunFire V880 8CPUs with 4 RAID A1000s (total disks
> about 54) and running Oracle8i 8.1.7.3 and 8.1.7.4 . The 3rd database is
on
> totally separate RAID arrays with its own Oracle Home software and hardly
> missed a beat - 15 minutes to reboot.
>
> Anyway, I recovered from the previous night hot backup and recovered using
> the archived logs that were generated since the hot backup. But, we did
lose
> some data, 1 hour for 1 database and about 2.5 hours for the other
database.
>
> Trying to prevent this, I am thinking of either shortening the potential
> window of lost data (REDOs) (is this possible even - depends on activity
> right?) or mirroring Oracle to a 3rd location (cross mirroring between the
2
> main databases which are on totally separate RAID systems - but concerned
> about contention).
>
> Does anyone else even use a 3rd multiplex REDO member ? I haven't , but
> will probably do this especially considering the current 2 RAID1 mirrors
are
> in 1 array.
>
> Next time we get new hardware I will make sure the Sys Admins know the 2
> mirrors I usually ask for should be on separate RAID arrays. I should have
> caught that. The 3rd database DOES have its 2 RAID1 mirrors in separate
> arrays. Losing data bothers me, although these clients were not too upset.
> We have other clients who would probably be less forgiving.
>
>
>
Received on Fri Jan 24 2003 - 18:06:57 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US