Re: Locally Managed Tablespaces ... again!!!

Richard Foote wrote:

> "Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:b0ofm7$kgd$1$830fa17d_at_news.demon.co.uk...
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> > Bottom line:
> > NEITHER of you is saying you shouldn't separate table
> > from index.
> > NEITHER of you is saying that if you've separated a table
> > and it's indexes then the job is done.
> > If you read each other's posts carefully you would notice
> > that you are arguing at cross-purposes.
> >
>
> Hi Jonathon,
>
> Fair enough but I think you and this entire discussion has missed a very key
> point.
>
> That is the utter most importance of separating segments which names are an
> anagram of "BIG BROWN COW" (eg. GROW_BOB_WINC) from segments that contains
> letters to the word "MANURE" hidden within (eg. MANAGEMENT_RULES_OK) as the
> resulting contention will generally grind such Oracle database systems to
> the ground.
>
> This is clearly documented in various books written by sadly underrated
> Oracle gurus who are fellow inmates in this lovely hospital of mine.
>
> Cheers ;)
>
> Richard

Do you guys do stand-up?

I've enjoyed the entire discussion / argument / point-counterpoint and it has tremendous educational value. Hope no-one minds if it all ends up on viewfoils. <g>

Daniel Morgan Received on Fri Jan 24 2003 - 02:55:38 CST