Re: Tech Comparison of Oracle versus MS Sqlserver 2000

From: P <zarathustri_at_a.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:03:00 +1100
Message-ID: <reKV9.26113$jM5.68678@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>

Dusan,

I have corrected the spelling of Ellison. This is the truth about this man - he was the first to champion the Sql language when no one was using it commercially. I read an old Sql manual written by him I think in the late 70s - when there was nothing like MS Dos around! In those days people had to write a page of code to get 2 records out of a database. In the book he showed he was convinced that the power of Sql would resolve many data access problems.

I post this here every few months, with additions and corrections, for the benefit of those who want a tech
comparison between the two products so they can convince their management.

Regards,

Porus.

"Dusan Bolek" <pagesflames_at_usa.net> wrote in message news:1e8276d6.0301160223.79625cac_at_posting.google.com... > "P" <zarathustri_at_a.com> wrote in message news:<FssV9.25204$jM5.66998_at_newsfeeds.bigpond.com>...
> > Oracle versus MS Sqlserver 2000
> > -----------------------------------
> > Technical Comparison of the Features in the two databases
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > By Faulkner, Kent (kent.faulkner_at_trane.com) USA
> > Updated by PorusHH, Australia
> > Version 3.5, January 2003

> <almost everything snipped>
>

> > Footnote:
> > Oracle is the first commercial Sql database and is 25 years old in 2002,
> > ie. it has been around since 1977. Larry Ellision the founder of Oracle
> > has been championing the Sql language before there was any company
around
> > like Microsoft.

>
> No, no, please do not post this anymore anywhere. It was here several
> times, we cannot bear it anymore. Pls stop this!
>
> BTW: Is funny if someone can't even spell name of guy whom he is
> trying to lick a...
>
> --
> _________________________________________
>
> Dusan Bolek, Ing.
> Oracle team leader
>
> Note: pagesflames_at_usa.net has been cancelled due to changes (maybe we
> can call it an overture to bankruptcy) on that server. I'm still using
> this email to prevent SPAM. Maybe one day I will change it and have a
> proper mail even for news, but right now I can be reached by this
> email.

Received on Thu Jan 16 2003 - 21:03:00 CST