Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: portability

Re: portability

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 03:29:37 GMT
Message-ID: <BWMS9.476177$pN3.51186@sccrnsc03>


Ditto.
Jim

--
Replace part of the email address: kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com
with family.  Remove the negative part, keep the minus sign.  You can figure
it out.
"Frank" <fvanbortel_at_netscape.net> wrote in message
news:3E1B3775.3020403_at_netscape.net...

> Niall Litchfield wrote:
> > "dmz17" <dmz17_at_nospam.nowhere.com> wrote in message
> > news:pan.2003.01.05.21.56.48.283429_at_nospam.nowhere.com...
> >
> >>If I had my way, nobody would use PL/SQL because they would not be
> >>portable.
> >
> >
> > And If I had my way people would analyse their business needs, buy or
> > develop an app to meet them and then stick with it as long as the
business
> > needs required. If you are changing one thing (as portability implies)
then
> > you can be damn sure the business has changed. Portability (like object
> > orientation or almost any other buzzword you can think of) suits
developers
> > far more than end users and businesses.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Niall Litchfield
> > Oracle DBA
> > Audit Commission UK
> > *****************************************
> > Please include version and platform
> > and SQL where applicable
> > It makes life easier and increases the
> > likelihood of a good answer
> > ******************************************
> >
> >
>
> Hear, hear. I'll buy you a pint of bitter or a nice
> whisky next time I'm in the neighbourhood.
>
> Frank
>
Received on Tue Jan 07 2003 - 21:29:37 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US