Re: locally managed tablespace & dictionary managed tablespace

You seem to know a lot about this subject - lot of good FACTS right. But, as usual, you seem to need an attitude adjustment.

Opinions don't belong anywhere in a posting, right? Wrong!

Not everyone is just like you (thankfully). Some people like to hear other's opinions.

"Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:gZRP9.12567$jM5.35658_at_newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
> "Bert Bear" <bertbear_at_NOSPAMbertbear.net> wrote in message
> news:4nRP9.2529$da3.1526135006_at_newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
> > Andi,
> >
> > IMHO, LMT are the only way to go. This opinion is from 23 years of
being
> a
> > operating system developer (e.g. file systems, IPC, GUI, schedulers,
> > dispatchers, memory management, internal trace, abend processing
> > backup/recovery applications, etc.) on three different operating systems
> > (IBM VM, Cray UNICOS, and IBM OS/2). The design of LMT is much better
> than
> > DMT (and the implementation seems to be better).
> >
>
> Oh please. What exactly does 23 years' experience in memory management buy
> you in terms of this discussion?
>
> What does "the design of LMT" mean? Tell us, please, about the block
dumps
> you've performed to verify and ascertain the innards of said design. If
> design is really an issue, tell us what you'd have changed, or precisely
why
> Oracle's design is so f***ing perfect.
>
> Exactly *WHY* do you think the implementation of LMT (which had quite a
few
> bugs in 8.1.5) is "better" than the implementation of DMT, which has been
> standard for well over 5 versions of Oracle, and has (practically) any
bugs
> it ever possessed long since ironed-out?
>
> Honesty. LMTs get the vote for all sorts of reasons, but design and
> implementation are the *very* least of them.
>
> So what we're left with is 23 years of largely irrelevant experience and
an
> "IMHO". Do you not think the original poster deserves better than that?
Like
> reasoned argument, maybe?
>
> Regards
> HJR
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > http://www.bmoshier.net/bertram
> >
> >
> > "andi" <andi_at_a.com> wrote in message
> > news:auodnb$7d5$1_at_mawar.singnet.com.sg...
> > > Hi,
> > > newbie question.
> > > I've read some books which mentioned about advantages of
locally-managed
> > > tablespace over dictionary-managed tablespace.
> > > My question is, are there advantages of dictionary-managed tablespace
> over
> > > locally-managed tablespace ?
> > > or when should we use dictionary-managed tablespace instead of
> > > locally-managed tablespace ?
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > > Andi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Mon Dec 30 2002 - 03:46:28 CST