Re: Inactive sessions

From: Howard J. Rogers <howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 21:48:33 +1100
Message-ID: <LOWN9.9338$jM5.26325@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>

"Frank" <fbortel_at_home.nl> wrote in message news:3E0836A7.4010309_at_home.nl...
> Howard J. Rogers wrote:
> > I agree they should be. But have you implemented MTS (which will mean
that
> > you couldn't care?)
> >
> > Regards
> > HJR
> >
> <snip!>
>
> Confusion strikes again - do you mean to say MTS is a bad idea
> in this case? Not seem many apps installs, but afaik MTS is 'standard'.
>
> Grtz, Frank
>

Clearly some incomprehension of the English language. MTS means he wouldn't care about stalled sessions, because the server processes would be off being busy on behalf of other sessions.

Does that sound like a bad idea to you?

HJR Received on Tue Dec 24 2002 - 04:48:33 CST