Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Redo Log Question

Re: Redo Log Question

From: Sybrand Bakker <gooiditweg_at_sybrandb.demon.nl>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:18:38 +0100
Message-ID: <91c90vogcg7mbg5ag3uvnosm08gtr082du@4ax.com>


On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 09:39:05 -0800, Chuckster <chuckycarson_at_networkcloud.com> wrote:

>
>When you have your redo logs created as follows:
>LOGFILE
> GROUP 1 '/u01/oradata/syrlims/redo01.log' SIZE 10M,
> GROUP 2 '/u02/oradata/syrlims/redo02.log' SIZE 10M,
> GROUP 3 '/u03/oradata/syrlims/redo03.log' SIZE 10M,
> GROUP 4 '/u04/oradata/syrlims/redo04.log' SIZE 10M
>
>
>This is merely 4 different log files with no redundancy correct? If I
>wanted path redundancy, I would need to add more log files per group and
> make sure they are on different volume groups/spindles correct?
>
>Thanks,
>CC
>
>
>
>-----------== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
> http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>-----= Over 100,000 Newsgroups - Unlimited Fast Downloads - 19 Servers =-----

These are 4 redo log groups with only 1 member per group, so no redundancy.
Nothing in Oracle will stop you from adding logmembers on the same drive, but doing so is pretty pointless.

Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA

To reply remove -verwijderdit from my e-mail address Received on Sat Dec 21 2002 - 12:18:38 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US