Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> rollback questions
I am trying to understand rollbacks, at least understanding how SAP
uses them and to tune them. We have been getting more ORA-01555s
since our database crossed the 100G size. Right now the rollbacks are
set to the default install. Here are the stats from a program called
orastat (plug:GREAT TOOL!):
sapprd:oraprd 3> ./orastat -ra
2002/12/20-16:19:35 orastat | oraver=8.1.7 oraver3=8.1 sqlcmd=sp
2002/12/20-16:19:35 orastat | ORACLE_SID=PRD
ORACLE_HOME=/oracle/PRD/817_64
2002/12/20-16:19:35 orastat | Version=2.33
orastat | Rollback Segments Statistics
RSSize : Current rollback segment size in bytes
-column removed, all 10641408 bytes (10M)
A Xn's : Number of current transactions using the rollback segment
-column removed, all currently 0
HWMSize : High Water Mark size in bytes
Wraps : Cumulative # of times a X'n continues writing from one
extents to another existing extent Avg Actv: Avg # of bytes in active extents in the rbs
measured over time
Name Extends Gets HWMSize Wraps Avg Actv Waits ------ ------- ------ ---------- ------ --------- ------
PRS_0 7 130478 25550848 176 2345674 12 PRS_1 6 124295 19161088 162 2210725 2 PRS_2 4 123095 19161088 161 2232942 0 PRS_3 1 125297 12771328 163 2136828 1 PRS_4 12 153932 36200448 154 17202515 3 PRS_5 28 150456 63889408 178 2647096 5 PRS_6 31 144235 42590208 210 8988732 15 PRS_7 4 127866 19161088 172 2810635 1 PRS_8 65 143432 138436608 232 95312420 2 PRS_9 4 129341 19161088 175 2206473 2 PRS_10 12 127924 31940608 174 2222152 3 PRS_11 0 121028 10641408 143 2130736 0 PRS_12 0 121148 10641408 146 2147608 0 PRS_13 62 142333 142696448 222 2131274 1 PRS_14 42 141261 91578368 223 6116854 3 PRS_15 5 130087 19161088 179 2132704 4 PRS_16 48 137197 108617728 210 2602272 2 PRS_17 120 166012 191684608 310 2893642 2 PRS_18 17 128125 38330368 175 4018525 1 PRS_19 20 131124 53239808 186 15698495 0
Questions:
If the rollbacks are 10M each, how can the high-watermark be higher?
Since SAP doesn't seem to use all of them equally, should a few
smaller but LARGER ones work better?
Thanks!
Vince
Received on Fri Dec 20 2002 - 16:31:20 CST