Re: Is it possible to put primary and standby database on the same machine

"Matthias Rogel" <rogel_at_web.de> wrote in message news:at497a$10aver$1_at_ID-86071.news.dfncis.de...
> ok, when we are crossposting propaganda:

It wasn't "propaganda". I use it. I know it. It's free (for a trial). And it works (albeit unsupported by Oracle). Three-node RACs on a laptop. Application Server. Standby Database. Streams. All working reliably.

I will check out this Bochs thing. If it works, I'd be happy to recommend it next time someone wants two machines on a PC.

HJR
> vmware is good, but note that there is a free - and also good -
> alternative on
> http://bochs.sourceforge.net/
>
>
>
>
>
> Howard J. Rogers wrote:
> > Are you using the OEM wizards?
> >
> > Because if so, memory tells me that it can't be done on the same
machine,
> > unless you do some fiddling with multiple listeners.
> >
> > But... there's a simple solution. And it's called VMware.
> >
> > Anytime you want to do things that need two (or more) machines, but you
only
> > have one PC on which to practice, VMware will fix it. www.vmware.com.
> >
> > Regards
> > HJR
> >
> >
> > "Ban Spam" <ban-spam_at_operamail.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns92DFAEF87792FSunnySD_at_68.6.19.6...
> >
> >>u705413818_at_spawnkill.ip-mobilphone.net (Joe Sath) wrote in
> >>news:l.1039471656.1286895751_at_wayne-nat.traffic.com:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I am learning dataGuard 9i, but I can not afford two machines.
> >>>Has anybody tried to put both instance on the same machine?
> >>>Will that work?
> >>
> >>Define "work"?
> >>
> >>If the system has a catestrophic failure & refuses to operate,
> >>what have you gained by running Data Guard on a 2nd instance?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
Received on Tue Dec 10 2002 - 05:00:25 CST