Re: RMAN and two LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_<n>

Kool.

2 Europeans slugging it out. (un-European like I say.)

"Marc Blum" <marc_at_marcblum.de> wrote in message news:vcvjuu4fo683og61pqnpmlgn5joi1m46g6_at_4ax.com...
> comments inside
>
> On Sun, 01 Dec 2002 12:47:14 +0100, Sybrand Bakker
> <gooiditweg_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 01 Dec 2002 11:55:33 +0100, Marc Blum <marc_at_marcblum.de>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>question:
> >>why doesn't RMAN1 recognise the already backuped arcs? Is it a bug or
well-known
> >>behaviour?
> >
> >
> >1 RMAN will always backup *one* copy on the archived log
>
> that's the concept, but it does not, as I descibed. Do you have any
explanation?
>
> >2 RMAN is capable of making duplex backups
>
> interesting. I missed that one.Thank you for the hint!
>
> >
> >That said: There is *no need at all* to have 2 RMAN processes with
> >distinct reposistories runnin
> >You simply should make duplex backups of one set of archivelogs.
>
> ok, see above
>
>
> >
> >Currently, you are either misusing RMAN or you don't understand how it
> >works.
>
> You are charming as ever! Really nice to have met you!
>
> I wouldn't speak of missuse, as no person or animal is harmed. And if I
missed
> one feature of many, where's the problem?
>
>
> Marc Blum
> mailto:marc_at_marcblum.de
> http://www.marcblum.de
Received on Sun Dec 01 2002 - 14:58:17 CST