Re: Oracle 8.1.7 on Windows 2000 2g per process memory limit

"Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:cPHA9.76252$g9.215335_at_newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
>
> "Chuckster" <chuckycarson_at_networkcloud.com> wrote in message
> news:3DD33DB7.2080204_at_networkcloud.com...
> >
> > What do you mean by fancier versions of Windows 2000?
>
> I imagine he is thinking of Advanced Server and Data Centre Server (each
of
> which costs squillions more than the basic Win2000 Server product, but
each
> of which also lifts the bar on memory allocation limits, to say nothing
else
> of what they do in terms of CPU counts and other things).
>
> I s'pose it also depends on your choice of desktop wallpaper and sound
> theme.
>
> Not that Oracle would give too hoots either way.
>
> Regards
> HJR
>
>
> >Also, the 3gb per
> > process is with the /3GB boot.init switch?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > CC
> >
> > Jeremy Smith wrote:
> > > Yeah, I rechecked my sources, and I'm pretty sure how it lays out is
> this:
> > >
> > > NT4.0 up to sp3 can support 2 gb per process/4gb total of user memory
> > > NT4 sp3 and up can support 3 gb per process/4gb total
> > > Win2000 can still only support 3gb per process, but up to 64gb total
> > > physical memory by using AWE, available on fancier versions of Windows
> > > 2000.
> > > WinXP can do up to 7152GB.
> > >
> > > Search the web for XP 2000 Kernel and the name Russinovich.
> > >
> > > Jer
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Uncensored Usenet News
> ==----------
> > http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> > -----= Over 100,000 Newsgroups - Unlimited Fast Downloads - 19 Servers
> =-----
>
>

Howard,

Just curious. Do I detect a hint that you prefer *ix to Windows?

Regards,
Paul Received on Fri Nov 15 2002 - 13:33:24 CST