Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: v$session_event in 9i, is it reported differently ?

Re: v$session_event in 9i, is it reported differently ?

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:44:54 -0000
Message-ID: <aqrp8t$20t$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>

Known bug.

Use the v$session.sid - 1 = v$session_event.sid

Fixed in version 10.

--
Regards

Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Next Seminar dates:
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html )

____USA__________November 7/9   (Detroit)
____USA__________November 19/21 (Dallas)
____England______November 12/14

The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html





Bass Chorng wrote in message ...

>I noticed in 9i, Oracle behaves differently with v$session_event.
>
>In pre-9i, I can find out every event wait, as long as the SQL is
>completed, in v$session_event of certain sid. But it no longer
>does that in 9i. Does anybody know if the behaviour changed ?
>
>For example, if I do a select count(*) of a table, then I query
>v$session_event of my sid, I will see a 'db file scattered read'
>showing in v$session_event immediately.
>
>With 9i, that 'db file scattered read' no long shows in
>v$session_event.
>
>I did not check v$session_wait to see if I had a full table
>scan there, but I am assuming for select count(*), oracle
>*HAS* to do a full table scan.
>
>Does anybody know why ? This behavior basically makes v$session_event
>useless because it is not reflecting the wait events.
Received on Tue Nov 12 2002 - 14:44:54 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US