Re: Standby database question

Stephen Harris <sweh_at_spuddy.mew.co.uk> schreef in berichtnieuws jv0mqa.50c.ln_at_spuddy.org...
| Anton Buijs <aammbuijs_at_xs4all.nl> wrote:
| > Datafile names do NOT need to be the same on the standby database.
| > With nit.ora parameter DB_FILE_NAME_CONVERT (V8.1.7) you can specify
pares
| > of strings to convert a name from primary to standby database.
|
| Right, I forgot about that mangling. I didn't use it since I prefer using
| symlinks to fake up the paths.
|
| > The OS and the version and the Oracle software version need to be the
same
| > on the standby db.
|
| The OS can be different; HPUX10.10 and HPUX10.20, for example. What's
| primarily the issue is the architecture.

You might be right that a minor version difference is possible. I can't speak from experience.
|
| > So you can't have a standby db on Sun Solaris and the primary db on HP
Unix.
|
| Right.
|
| --
| Stephen Harris
| sweh_at_spuddy.mew.co.uk
| The truth is the truth, and opinion just opinion. But what is what?
| My employer pays to ignore my opinions; you get to do it for free.
Received on Sun Nov 10 2002 - 10:26:45 CST