"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:appcbt$qtb$1$8300dec7_at_news.demon.co.uk...
>
> Correct,
>
> There were no problems due to 'simple volume';
> but there were various 'mechanical' constraints
> on data arrival, and query requirements that
> added some interesting implementation details -
> which then ran into a seemingly endless stream
> of 'interesting' side-effects. In short, most of the
> problems were arguably bugs - mostly fixed in
> newer versions.
>
> --
> Regards
>
> Jonathan Lewis
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
>
> Next Seminar dates:
> (see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html )
>
> ____USA__________November 7/9 (Detroit)
> ____USA__________November 19/21 (Dallas)
> ____England______November 12/14
>
> The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
>
>
>
>
>
> Pablo Sanchez wrote in message ...
> >"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote in
> news:app48s$mhr$1
> >$8302bc10_at_news.demon.co.uk:
> >
> >>
> >> Correction - 32GB per week.
> >
> >Was that 32GB/week - per 24 hours, per seven days a week? Doesn't
> >sound like all that much ...
> >
> >32G/wk * wk/7 days * 1 day/24h * 1h/60m * 1024M/G
> >
> > = 3.25MB/minute
> >
> >This makes me 'guess' that the issues were not related to hardware
> >performance ... business issues? Bugs?
> >--
> >Pablo Sanchez, High-Performance Database Engineering
> >http://www.hpdbe.com
>
>
I bet GBP 100 the problem wasn't load performance; it was dirty data....
It *always* is.
Paul
Received on Wed Oct 30 2002 - 16:13:37 CST
