Re: 90GB table on Windows 2000

From: Pablo Sanchez <pablo_at_dev.null>
Date: 30 Oct 2002 11:27:36 -0600
Message-ID: <Xns92B76B609A33Fpingottpingottbah@209.189.89.243>

"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote in news:app48s$mhr$1 $8302bc10_at_news.demon.co.uk:

>
> Correction - 32GB per week.

Was that 32GB/week - per 24 hours, per seven days a week? Doesn't sound like all that much ...

32G/wk * wk/7 days * 1 day/24h * 1h/60m * 1024M/G

This makes me 'guess' that the issues were not related to hardware performance ... business issues? Bugs?

-- 
Pablo Sanchez, High-Performance Database Engineering
http://www.hpdbe.com

Received on Wed Oct 30 2002 - 11:27:36 CST