Sorry if I offended anyone with that "commercial waste", though I believe
the package is not really that bad. :) I agree that if you put some effort into
it, you can do whatever you want with UTL_SMTP, and our package does use
UTL_SMTP for transport, but that effort may be substantial if you need to go
beyond basic stuff, and our solution may appear cheaper than developer's time
put into developing comparable functionality. Why reinvent the wheel?
--
Vladimir Zakharychev (bob@dpsp-yes.com) http://www.dpsp-yes.com
Dynamic PSP(tm) - the first true RAD toolkit for Oracle-based internet applications.
All opinions are mine and do not necessarily go in line with those of my employer.
"NorwoodThree" <norwoodthree_at_my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:ba03e2c.0210221521.d22a5c_at_posting.google.com...
> There's no need for this commercial waste. You should be able to do
> whatever you want with the UTL_SMTP package.
Received on Thu Oct 24 2002 - 00:37:16 CDT
