I wouldn't worry about me asking more questions some probably
bordering on inane. However, it probably won't be for a bit yet, I am
still learning the new architecture and what not..
--
Regards,
Bill Lucas
"Paul Brewer" <paul_at_paul.brewers.org.uk> wrote in message
news:3db076d1$1_2_at_mk-nntp-1.news.uk.worldonline.com...
> "Bill Lucas" <WCLucas_at_coolblue.com> wrote in message
> news:G6kr9.29638$Lg2.7426034_at_news2.news.adelphia.net...
> > David,
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion, I'll check that out as I continue to
> > familiarize myself with this stuff. Always looking for something
that
> > might make it easier. I was given a rather limited time to pull
this
> > all off so I am already wondering how I am going to be able to do
it.
> > It will probably take me longer than what others have allotted for
> > this project (when doesn't it). Anyway I have some idea now and
as I
> > continue to read up on all of it I am beginning to see why every
one
> > was so strong in their suggestions about *NOT* porting the code
and
> > what not. I still have a steep hill ahead but I am starting to
make
> > visible progress on all of this.
> >
> > Thanks again for the suggestion.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Bill
>
> Bill,
>
> Previous posters have a point which I don't deny. Re-engineering
rather than
> 'porting' is almost certainly the best option.
> But please continue asking questions; we'll do all we can to help.
> After all, we need another Oracle convert, don't we, folks?
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
>
>
Received on Wed Oct 23 2002 - 09:33:33 CDT
