Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle Doc Mixup?

Re: Oracle Doc Mixup?

From: Daniel Morgan <dmorgan_at_exesolutions.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 22:59:17 GMT
Message-ID: <3DA211A6.24DD5A45@exesolutions.com>


Pete Sharman wrote:

> In article <3DA1CBDF.3333120B_at_exesolutions.com>, Daniel says...
> >
> >According to:
> >http://otn.oracle.com/docs/products/oracle9i/doc_library/release2/appdev.920/a96587/qfaqs.htm#80231
> >
> >If a latency less than 0 was specified in the propagation schedule, the
> >job is rescheduled to run after the specified latency. The time at which
> >the job actually runs depends on other factors, such as the number of
> >ready jobs and the number of job_queue_processes. It may also be
> >affected by the value for job_queue_interval. Please refer to the
> >MANAGING JOB QUEUES chapter of the Oracle9i Database Administrator's
> >Guide for more information on job queues and SNP background processes.
> >
> >But according to my 9.2 installation job_queue_interval is not a valid
> >ini.ora parameter.
> >
> >Anyone have any insight on this one?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Daniel Morgan
> >
> I suspect the doc hasn't caught up with the parameter in this one. The
> parameter still exists, but is an underscore parameter in 9.2 if I recall
> correctly.
>
> HTH. Additions and corrections welcome.
>
> Pete
>
> SELECT standard_disclaimer, witty_remark FROM company_requirements;

Thanks. But given that the docs are of no value ... is there a replacement parameter?

Using an underscore init parameter in many shops is a non-starter as you know.

Daniel Morgan Received on Mon Oct 07 2002 - 17:59:17 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US