Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle Doc Mixup?

Re: Oracle Doc Mixup?

From: Pete Sharman <peter.sharman_at_oracle.com>
Date: 7 Oct 2002 14:06:26 -0700
Message-ID: <anst0i0253e@drn.newsguy.com>


In article <3DA1CBDF.3333120B_at_exesolutions.com>, Daniel says...
>
>According to:
>http://otn.oracle.com/docs/products/oracle9i/doc_library/release2/appdev.920/a96587/qfaqs.htm#80231
>
>If a latency less than 0 was specified in the propagation schedule, the
>job is rescheduled to run after the specified latency. The time at which
>the job actually runs depends on other factors, such as the number of
>ready jobs and the number of job_queue_processes. It may also be
>affected by the value for job_queue_interval. Please refer to the
>MANAGING JOB QUEUES chapter of the Oracle9i Database Administrator's
>Guide for more information on job queues and SNP background processes.
>
>But according to my 9.2 installation job_queue_interval is not a valid
>ini.ora parameter.
>
>Anyone have any insight on this one?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Daniel Morgan
>

I suspect the doc hasn't caught up with the parameter in this one. The parameter still exists, but is an underscore parameter in 9.2 if I recall correctly.

HTH. Additions and corrections welcome.

Pete

SELECT standard_disclaimer, witty_remark FROM company_requirements; Received on Mon Oct 07 2002 - 16:06:26 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US