Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Data Buffer Cache

Re: Data Buffer Cache

From: Richard Foote <richard.foote_at_bigpond.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 10:22:11 +1000
Message-ID: <QyPh9.35013$g9.98743@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>


Hi Howard and all,

I think I'm missing something here or maybe it's somewhat out of the scope of this discussion (although I don't think it is).

This concept of sizing redo logs in order to control the behaviour of checkpointing. I have no problem with it pre 8i. However it's all somewhat irrelevant (or it should be) since the changes in behaviour of the buffer cache and the introduction of the fast_start_io_target parameter in 8i (and fast_start_mttr_target in 9i).

By setting these parameters appropriately, the sizing of redo logs in order to control checkpoint behaviour is no longer an issue per se. Oracle will continually post the DBWR to ensure that dirty blocks preventing these targets from being met are flushed to disk.

The advantages of course being *predicable* instance recovery times regardless of size of redo logs or when the last checkpoint may have completed and an *even* load at all times, no longer there being spikes of activity as Oracle desperately tries to complete a checkpoint.

I just think it's a point worth mentioning ...

Cheers

Richard
"Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:3d878a16_at_dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> I also tell them of the database in Queensland that produces a 500M
archive
> every 7 minutes.
>
> I flatter myself that people don't come out of the classroom until they've
> got as a complete a picture as it's possible to paint in the time allowed.
> If you have to switch that frequently, so be it. Just be aware of the
costs
> involved. And if you can avoid switching that frequently, it's generally a
> good idea to do so, bearing in mind the further potential costs in
instance
> recovery scenarios.
>
> The bottom line I give them is: size your logs so that you end up
switching
> (and hence checkpointing) at a rate you are happy with.
>
> Regards
> HJR
>
> "Sybrand Bakker" <gooiditweg_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message
> news:t2oeouk7kk8kugc5m2b3c4vlij4jipr61a_at_4ax.com...
> > On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:12:01 +1000, "Howard J. Rogers"
> > <howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > >I also tell them of the 'one switch per hour' school of DBAing, so they
> get
> > >both sides.
> >
> > So what if you often have 250M redolog in less than 30 minutes?
> > (I'm not joking)
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
> >
> > To reply remove -verwijderdit from my e-mail address
>
>
Received on Tue Sep 17 2002 - 19:22:11 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US