Re: cache vs keep buffer pool

Niall Litchfield wrote:
>
> Me I'm a talisker/lagavullin type guy myself. Like sucking a tea bag through
> peat. wonderful stuff.
>
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> Audit Commission UK
> *****************************************
> Please include version and platform
> and SQL where applicable
> It makes life easier and increases the
> likelihood of a good answer
>
> ******************************************
> "Norman Dunbar" <Norman.Dunbar_at_lfs.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:E2F6A70FE45242488C865C3BC1245DA702935A82_at_lnewton.leeds.lfs.co.uk...
> > Hi Niall,
> >
> > I agree that blends should be poured away.
> > And so should single/double and even triple malts.
> >
> > That stuff tastes bleeding awful - no wonder we Scots export most of it
> > :o)
> >
> > Mind you, Balvennie (Spelling?) is drinkable :o)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Norman.
> > (Who hails from not a million miles away from Speyside)
> >
> > -------------------------------------
> > Norman Dunbar
> > Database/Unix administrator
> > Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
> > mailto:Norman.Dunbar_at_LFS.co.uk
> > Tel: 0113 289 6265
> > Fax: 0113 289 3146
> > URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
> > -------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Niall Litchfield [mailto:n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk]
> > Posted At: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:56 PM
> > Posted To: server
> > Conversation: cache vs keep buffer pool
> > Subject: Re: cache vs keep buffer pool
> >
> >
> > >> Single Malts of course should be drunk neat, whilst blends should be
> > poured
> > >> away untouched.
> >
> >

Oh dear oh dear...

For peaty mastery, you can't go past a cask strength Laphroaig or a 20 year old Glenlivet.

:-)

-- 
==============================
Connor McDonald

http://www.oracledba.co.uk

"Some days you're the pigeon, some days you're the statue..."