Me I'm a talisker/lagavullin type guy myself. Like sucking a tea bag through
peat. wonderful stuff.
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
*****************************************
Please include version and platform
and SQL where applicable
It makes life easier and increases the
likelihood of a good answer
******************************************
"Norman Dunbar" <Norman.Dunbar_at_lfs.co.uk> wrote in message
news:E2F6A70FE45242488C865C3BC1245DA702935A82_at_lnewton.leeds.lfs.co.uk...
> Hi Niall,
>
> I agree that blends should be poured away.
> And so should single/double and even triple malts.
>
> That stuff tastes bleeding awful - no wonder we Scots export most of it
> :o)
>
> Mind you, Balvennie (Spelling?) is drinkable :o)
>
> Cheers,
> Norman.
> (Who hails from not a million miles away from Speyside)
>
> -------------------------------------
> Norman Dunbar
> Database/Unix administrator
> Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
> mailto:Norman.Dunbar_at_LFS.co.uk
> Tel: 0113 289 6265
> Fax: 0113 289 3146
> URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
> -------------------------------------
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Niall Litchfield [mailto:n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk]
> Posted At: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:56 PM
> Posted To: server
> Conversation: cache vs keep buffer pool
> Subject: Re: cache vs keep buffer pool
>
>
> >> Single Malts of course should be drunk neat, whilst blends should be
> poured
> >> away untouched.
>
>
Received on Fri Aug 30 2002 - 03:44:35 CDT
