Re: 9i OEM console extremely slow

ooops...

sorry Chuck, JRE is the OMS and it's an NT service which is why ya can't kill it.

I meant JREW.

Might be worth putting OEM client into trace and checking the class load times.

Here's the link... let us know what you get.. http://otn.oracle.com/docs/products/oracle9i/doc_library/release2/em.920/a96 673/appb.htm#627549

"Chuck" <chuckh_at_softhome.net> wrote in message news:ah6rks$qqs3q$1_at_ID-85580.news.dfncis.de...
> When I try to kill JRE I get an error saying that I can't kill it. I can
> kill JREW, rerun the console, but it still takes forever to load.
>
> "Telemachus" <telemachus_at_ulysseswillreturn.net> wrote in message
> news:5FBZ8.3161$zX3.2467_at_news.indigo.ie...
> > start it (the client)
> >
> > while waiting kill all the JRE from task manager
> >
> > then start it again....
> > it's a java problem.
> >
> >
> > that's what works for me- but that's on my 817 OEM
> > I'm using W2K Server with 256M.
> >
> > Alternatively download Ethereal and watch the network packets go by
> >
> > let me know how you get on.
> > "Chuck" <chuckh_at_softhome.net> wrote in message
> > news:ah6iqb$quu1b$1_at_ID-85580.news.dfncis.de...
> > > My 9i OEM console used to work fine. Starting this week it takes
> anywhere
> > > from 10 to 15 minutes after launching the app before it presents the
> logon
> > > dialog. Same thing is happening at one of my colleagues workstations.
It
> > > does not appear to be an OMS issue as once we finally get the login
> dialog
> > > we can sign on to the OMS as quickly as ever. There is no network
drive
> > > involved. Both workstations have all of the components installed
> locally.
> > > Nothing new has been installed. In fact I was on vacation during the
> > between
> > > when it worked normaly and when it became so slow.
> > >
> > > Pinging the OMS from the client, comes back in milliseconds. Same
thing
> > from
> > > the OMS to the repository database. I am perplexed.
> > >
> > > Both workstations and the OMS are win2k professional with 128mb of
RAM.
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Thu Jul 18 2002 - 11:57:48 CDT