Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: ORA-27123: unable to attached to shared memory segment

Re: ORA-27123: unable to attached to shared memory segment

From: nettdata <nettdata_at_noSpAM_nettdata.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 02:26:41 GMT
Message-ID: <3D34D5F7.5010408@noSpAM_nettdata.com>


I _HIGHLY_ recommend checking out this page:

http://www.puschitz.com/InstallingOracle9i.shtml

It answers that question and a whole lot more.

...jeff

OtisUsenet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed Oracle 9.2.0.1.0 on Linux (RedHat 7.3), and run into a
> problem while trying to create my first database via 'dmca'.
>
> This Linux machine has 1 GB RAM.
> Shared memory from /proc/sys/kernel/shm*:
> $ cat /proc/sys/kernel/shm*
> 2097152
> 33554432 <-- shmmax
> 4096
>
> Here are some DB parameters:
>
> db_block_size 8192
> db_cache_size 32MB
> db_file_multiblock_read_count 16
> java_pool_size 20971520
> job_queue_processes 10
> large_pool_size 16777216
> open_cursors 300
> pga_aggregate_target 25165824
> processes 150
> shared_pool_size 83886080
> sort_area_size 524288
>
>
> Here are some more current kernel numbers:
>
> $ ipcs -l
>
> ------ Shared Memory Limits --------
> max number of segments = 4096
> max seg size (kbytes) = 32768
> max total shared memory (kbytes) = 8388608
> min seg size (bytes) = 1
>
> ------ Semaphore Limits --------
> max number of arrays = 128
> max semaphores per array = 250
> max semaphores system wide = 32000
> max ops per semop call = 32
> semaphore max value = 32767
>
>
> I have tried setting the 'Typical' database via Database Configuration
> Assistant, but that resulted in the same error.
>
> I have tried setting use_indirect_data_buffer to TRUE, but that gave
> me a different error (ORA-00385: cannot enable Very Large Memory with
> new buffer cache parameters).
>
> Has anyone got any ideas why this is failing?
> I didn't choose any large memory allocations anywhere (I left
> everything at its default value). Do I still need to increase the
> number in /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax?
>
> Thanks,
> Otis
Received on Tue Jul 16 2002 - 21:26:41 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US