Pardon me for my ignorance, but I dont understand the diff between 2
GB and 2000 M. I'm gueesing that it has to do with the the number of
real bytes between the two numbers? So if so, how does the boundary
issue create problems?
"Paul Brewer" <paul_at_paul.brewers.org.uk> wrote in message news:<3d308908_2_at_mk-nntp-1.news.uk.worldonline.com>...
> "Steve S" <stevens_at_coloradocustomware.com> wrote in message
> news:bafba412.0207130444.407a0c4f_at_posting.google.com...
> > Richard,
> > So you would recommend breaking up a large tablespace into many
> > smaller (2 GB)datafiles for manageability. Is there a performance hit
> > in spanning a tablespace across many datafiles over having one big
> > file?
> >
> > THanks for your help,
> > Steve
> >
> PMFJI.
>
> I agree with Richard, and moreover I tend towards the conservative. I like
> 2000M datafiles, rather than 2GB, as I'm slightly nervous of files which end
> exactly on a boundary.
>
> Just my 2c, and HTH,
> Paul
Received on Mon Jul 15 2002 - 14:56:12 CDT
