Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Maxextents unlimited on LMT ?

Re: Maxextents unlimited on LMT ?

From: Richard Foote <richard.foote_at_bigpond.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:22:27 +1000
Message-ID: <0NMW8.31671$Hj3.95713@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>


Hi Nuno,

I completely agree, that's my point. Control for maxextents is (was) a capacity management aid. I have no problem with the default behaviour being changed to unlimited, but *only* unlimited ?

I am certified. It hurt a little but after a few Panadols was soon over it :)

Regards

Richard
"Nuno Souto" <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au> wrote in message news:dd5cc559.0207091802.541898a0_at_posting.google.com...
> Pete Sharman <peter.sharman_at_oracle.com> wrote in message
news:<agcts10d0h_at_drn.newsguy.com>...
>
> PMFJI, but this one cannot be let alone...
>
> The
> > number of extents in a locally managed tablespace has absolutely none
(very
> > negligible in the worst of cases) impact on performance. As such there
is no
> > need to set this parameter which puts an artificial limit on the size of
an
> > object and hence, requires additional manual intervention.
>
>
> This is so very wrong! Logic: number of extents of an
> object has no impact on performance, therefore no need
> to control its maximum size.
>
> Hellloooooooooo??????
> Can anyone NOT spot the completely wrong logical inference?
>
>
> > What exactly is your client not convinced about? Do they find the
argument of
> > number of extent having no performance impact unacceptable or do they
have a
> > need to control the object size?"
> >
>
> I'd dare say at a minimum, that MAXEXTENTS was never a performance
> control parameter. It was in fact a capacity management one. Therefore,
> it shouldn't have been removed as part of a performance control exercise?
>
> Anyways, it might make its way back as a quota control system
> managed by another DBMS_**** package?
>
> BTW, another gripe: replacing the complexity of storage management
> parameters by the complexity of multiple DBMS_**** packages is
> not my idea of simplifying DBA tasks. The number of these packages
> in the last few versions has grown exponentially. Not good.
>
> But then again, what do I know about "DBAing"? I'm not even certified...
>
> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> nsouto_at_optushome.com.au
Received on Tue Jul 09 2002 - 21:22:27 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US